Ryzen Z2 Go
Popular choices:
Xeon E5-2687W v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 150W, a 148W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Xeon E5-2687W v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W v2 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,188 vs 12,301).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-2687W v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,112 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Go mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌7400% higher power demand at 150W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Xeon E5-2687W v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 150W, a 148W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Xeon E5-2687W v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W v2 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,188 vs 12,301).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,112 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Go mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌7400% higher power demand at 150W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2687W v2 better than Ryzen Z2 Go?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 37 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 139 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 308 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 308 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon E5-2687W v2
Ryzen Z2 Go
Ryzen Z2 Go
The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon E5-2687W v2
Xeon E5-2687W v2
The Xeon E5-2687W v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,301 points. Launch price was $1,605.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Z2 Go packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2687W v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v2 — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z2 Go (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen Z2 Go uses the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Z2 Go scores 12,188 against the Xeon E5-2687W v2's 12,301 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2687W v2. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W v2.
| Feature | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 20 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-73% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt R (2025) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 12,188 | 12,301 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,802 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,842 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,073 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go) / not specified (Xeon E5-2687W v2). The Ryzen Z2 Go includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.
| Feature | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | SVM | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon E5-2687W v2
