
Ryzen Z2 Go
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2143IT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Xeon D-2143IT needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2143IT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon D-2143IT
2018Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z2 Go across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,116 vs 12,188).
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Xeon D-2143IT
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Xeon D-2143IT needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2143IT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z2 Go across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,116 vs 12,188).
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z2 Go better than Xeon D-2143IT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon D-2143IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon D-2143IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon D-2143IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 252 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 203 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon D-2143IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 303 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon D-2143IT


Ryzen Z2 Go
Ryzen Z2 Go
The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-2143IT
Xeon D-2143IT
The Xeon D-2143IT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2518. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,116 points. Launch price was $566.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Z2 Go packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-2143IT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-2143IT has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go versus 3 GHz on the Xeon D-2143IT — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z2 Go (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Z2 Go uses the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon D-2143IT uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Z2 Go scores 12,188 against the Xeon D-2143IT's 12,116 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Z2 Go. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go vs 11 MB on the Xeon D-2143IT.
| Feature | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon D-2143IT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+43% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 11 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt R (2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 12,188 | 12,116 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,802 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,842 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,073 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go) / not specified (Xeon D-2143IT). The Ryzen Z2 Go includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Xeon D-2143IT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.
| Feature | Ryzen Z2 Go | Xeon D-2143IT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | SVM | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











