
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z2 Go
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z2 Go across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,073 vs 12,188).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 15W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 13W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 13W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z2 Go across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,073 vs 12,188).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 15W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z2 Go better than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 305 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen Z2 Go


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,073 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen Z2 Go
Ryzen Z2 Go
The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Z2 Go offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z2 Go (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U uses the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Z2 Go uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U scores 12,073 against the Ryzen Z2 Go's 12,188 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Z2 Go. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U vs 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.3 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3 GHz+43% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) | Rembrandt R (2025) |
| PassMark | 12,073 | 12,188 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 5,802 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,842 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,073 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U) / SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go). The Ryzen Z2 Go includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | SVM |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











