
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2687W v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,073 vs 12,301).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-2687W v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,112 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020Xeon E5-2687W v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,073 vs 12,301).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,112 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2687W v2 better than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 139 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 308 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Xeon E5-2687W v2


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,073 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2687W v2
Xeon E5-2687W v2
The Xeon E5-2687W v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,301 points. Launch price was $1,605.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2687W v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v2 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U uses the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U scores 12,073 against the Xeon E5-2687W v2's 12,301 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2687W v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+62% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 12,073 | 12,301+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











