
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,000 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.2 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (3,050 vs 3,644).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (98,427 vs 120,000).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+19.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 27.2 PassMark/$ ($7,999 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
2023Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,000 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.2 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+19.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (3,050 vs 3,644).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (98,427 vs 120,000).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 27.2 PassMark/$ ($7,999 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX better than Ryzen Threadripper 7980X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 787 FPS | 803 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 577 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 269 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 889 FPS | 889 FPS |
| medium | 728 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 654 FPS |
| ultra | 556 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 419 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 365 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1131 FPS | 1131 FPS |
| medium | 1014 FPS | 1014 FPS |
| high | 889 FPS | 889 FPS |
| ultra | 802 FPS | 802 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 890 FPS | 890 FPS |
| medium | 783 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 688 FPS | 688 FPS |
| ultra | 599 FPS | 599 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 7980X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX


Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,949 points. Launch price was $4,999.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 154,361 points. Launch price was $7,999.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X scores 135,949 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX's 154,361 — a 12.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 98,427 vs 120,000 (19.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,050 vs 3,644, a 17.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,000 vs 37,967 (37.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 135,949 | 154,361+14% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 98,427 | 120,000+22% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,050 | 3,644+19% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000 | 37,967+46% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the sTR5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 2048 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 7980X targets High-end Desktop / Content Creation, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 7980X rivals Xeon w7-3465X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | High-end Desktop / Content Creation | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X launched at $4999 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX debuted at $7999. On MSRP ($4999 vs $7999), the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is $3000 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X delivers 27.2 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X the 34% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999-38% | $7999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.2+41% | 19.3 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











