
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 105W instead of 350W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,174 vs 3,016).
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 40,000).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 71.0 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- β +38.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Costs $120 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Delivers 121.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- β233.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- β Draws 105W instead of 350W, a 245W reduction.
Why buy it
- β +38.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Costs $120 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Delivers 121.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,174 vs 3,016).
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 40,000).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 71.0 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- β233.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than Ryzen 9 5900X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 228 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX β a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 β a 53.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 40,000 (62.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,174 vs 3,016, a 32.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 23,596 (66% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 67,561+73% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | 40,000+90% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | 3,016+39% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | 23,596+98% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Workstation | β |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($549 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX β making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 75.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $429-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0 | 157.5+122% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












