
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Costs $100 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 67,561).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Delivers 131.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- β30.4% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- β438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- β Costs $100 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Delivers 131.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 67,561).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β30.4% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- β438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 228 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX β a 20.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 β a 100.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 67,561+201% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 40,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 3,016 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 23,596 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($329 vs $429), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX β making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 79.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-23% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2 | 157.5+131% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











