
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $600 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Delivers 104.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (38,955 vs 39,929).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βNo AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020Why buy it
- β +2.5% higher PassMark.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $600 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Delivers 104.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Why buy it
- β +2.5% higher PassMark.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (38,955 vs 39,929).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βNo AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 773 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 638 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 569 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 243 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 998 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 970 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 823 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 725 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 847 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 745 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 630 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 405 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,929 points. Launch price was $1,149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX β a 11% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX's 39,929 β a 2.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. Both processors carry 64 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 39,929+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+6553500% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX rivals Xeon Silver 4314.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation | β |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX debuted at $1149. On MSRP ($549 vs $1149), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $600 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX β making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 68.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-52% | $1149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+104% | 34.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












