
EPYC 9374F
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9374F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $860 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (79,889 vs 82,009).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9374F moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9374F
2022Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $860 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (79,889 vs 82,009).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9374F moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9374F better than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 584 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 538 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 397 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 817 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 690 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 624 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 545 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 616 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1138 FPS | 942 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 842 FPS |
| high | 875 FPS | 724 FPS |
| ultra | 784 FPS | 639 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 880 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 774 FPS | 677 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 570 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 373 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

EPYC 9374F
EPYC 9374F
The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.


Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 79,889 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9374F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 9374F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9374F scores 82,009 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X's 79,889 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 9374F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9374F vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 64 / 128+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz+33% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 82,009+3% | 79,889 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 64,366 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 22,045 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9374F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9374F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — the EPYC 9374F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9374F) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9374F) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) — the EPYC 9374F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9374F) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X).
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 256 GB+4368967% |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9374F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Ryzen Threadripper 3990X rivals Core i9-10980XE.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9374F launched at $4850 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X debuted at $3990. On MSRP ($4850 vs $3990), the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is $860 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9374F delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 20.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X the 16.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4850 | $3990-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.9 | 20.0+18% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












