
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6438Y+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 24.0 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).
- ❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6438Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,884 less on MSRP ($2,607 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 71.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($2,607 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,660 vs 62,946).
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019Xeon Gold 6438Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,884 less on MSRP ($2,607 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 71.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($2,607 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 24.0 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).
- ❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6438Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,660 vs 62,946).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 3970X better than Xeon Gold 6438Y+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 806 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 528 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 652 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 98 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 927 FPS | 961 FPS |
| high | 862 FPS | 906 FPS |
| ultra | 765 FPS | 822 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 776 FPS | 831 FPS |
| medium | 644 FPS | 739 FPS |
| high | 580 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 615 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 310 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1325 FPS | 916 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 832 FPS |
| high | 1073 FPS | 717 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1031 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 900 FPS | 634 FPS |
| high | 778 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 744 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Gold 6438Y+


Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Xeon Gold 6438Y+
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
The Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,660 points. Launch price was $3,141.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X scores 62,946 against the Xeon Gold 6438Y+'s 62,660 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+13% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+85% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+113% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 62,946 | 62,660 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 44,510 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,664 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,739 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6438Y+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+) — the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+6553500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 80+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6438Y+). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE; Xeon Gold 6438Y+ rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X launched at $4491 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ debuted at $2607. On MSRP ($4491 vs $2607), the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is $1884 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 24.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — making the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ the 52.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4491 | $2607-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 24.0+71% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












