
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7945HX
2023Why buy it
- β +0.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β Draws 55W instead of 280W, a 225W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Ryzen Threadripper 3960X needs a discrete GPU.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- β 214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (34,260 vs 34,521).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $1,399 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β409.1% higher power demand at 280W vs 55W.
- βOlder platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7945HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7945HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7945HX
2023Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
2019Why buy it
- β +0.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β Draws 55W instead of 280W, a 225W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Ryzen Threadripper 3960X needs a discrete GPU.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- β 214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (34,260 vs 34,521).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $1,399 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β409.1% higher power demand at 280W vs 55W.
- βOlder platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7945HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7945HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7945HX better than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 744 FPS | 835 FPS |
| medium | 620 FPS | 706 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 271 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 927 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 862 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 765 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 718 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 581 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1129 FPS | 1325 FPS |
| medium | 1006 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 873 FPS | 1074 FPS |
| ultra | 768 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 900 FPS | 1032 FPS |
| medium | 790 FPS | 900 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 778 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 744 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X


Ryzen 9 7945HX
Ryzen 9 7945HX
The Ryzen 9 7945HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023-03-12. It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023β2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,425 points. Launch price was $700.


Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 54,763 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7945HX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 24 cores / 48 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7945HX versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X β a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7945HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7945HX uses the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023β2024) architecture (CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses Matisse (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 54,425 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X's 54,763 β a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 34,521 vs 34,260 (0.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7945HX). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,774 vs 1,270, a 74.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7945HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7945HX vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+20% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 128 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023β2024) | Matisse (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 54,425 | 54,763 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 34,521 | 34,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,774+118% | 1,270 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,214 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7945HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7945HX versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X β the Ryzen 9 7945HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7945HX) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7945HX) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) β the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 7945HX) and AMD TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 88+214% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7945HX supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7945HX) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). The Ryzen 9 7945HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7945HX targets Extreme Gaming / Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7945HX rivals Core i9-14900HX; Ryzen Threadripper 3960X rivals Core i9-10900X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Extreme Gaming / Mobile Workstation | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












