
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Popular choices:

Xeon w5-3535X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7945HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 53 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon w5-3535X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon w5-3535X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3535X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,214 vs 30,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3535X, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
Xeon w5-3535X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,699 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7945HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7945HX.
Ryzen 9 7945HX
2023Xeon w5-3535X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 53 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon w5-3535X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon w5-3535X.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3535X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,214 vs 30,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3535X, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,699 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7945HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7945HX.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w5-3535X better than Ryzen 9 7945HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Xeon w5-3535X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 106 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Xeon w5-3535X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 744 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 620 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 547 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Xeon w5-3535X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 1045 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 967 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 829 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 718 FPS | 994 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 880 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 798 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 395 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Xeon w5-3535X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1129 FPS | 1211 FPS |
| medium | 1006 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 873 FPS | 925 FPS |
| ultra | 768 FPS | 808 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 900 FPS | 979 FPS |
| medium | 790 FPS | 842 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 734 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 630 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 630 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7945HX and Xeon w5-3535X


Ryzen 9 7945HX
Ryzen 9 7945HX
The Ryzen 9 7945HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023-03-12. It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,425 points. Launch price was $700.

Xeon w5-3535X
Xeon w5-3535X
The Xeon w5-3535X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 55,532 points. Launch price was $1,689.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7945HX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-3535X offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon w5-3535X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7945HX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3535X — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7945HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7945HX uses the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm), while the Xeon w5-3535X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 54,425 against the Xeon w5-3535X's 55,532 — a 2% lead for the Xeon w5-3535X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,774 vs 2,300, a 18.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7945HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,214 vs 30,000 (59.7% advantage for the Xeon w5-3535X). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7945HX vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w5-3535X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Xeon w5-3535X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 20 / 40+25% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+13% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+22% | 52.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 54,425 | 55,532+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 34,521 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,774+21% | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,214 | 30,000+85% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7945HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-3535X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Xeon w5-3535X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7945HX) vs 4 (Xeon w5-3535X). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7945HX) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3535X) — the Xeon w5-3535X offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 7945HX) and W790 (Xeon w5-3535X).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Xeon w5-3535X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 4096 GB+6300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 112+300% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7945HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3535X). The Ryzen 9 7945HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon w5-3535X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7945HX targets Extreme Gaming / Mobile Workstation, Xeon w5-3535X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7945HX rivals Core i9-14900HX; Xeon w5-3535X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Xeon w5-3535X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Extreme Gaming / Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












