Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD

Ryzen 9 7945HX

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 7945HX

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (54,425 vs 55,025).

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

2025

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7945HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7945HX.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max+ 395 better than Ryzen 9 7945HX?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 9 7945HX is ahead with a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the better fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 1.1% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 9 7945HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
1080p
low301 FPS283 FPS
medium276 FPS257 FPS
high224 FPS211 FPS
ultra190 FPS178 FPS
1440p
low271 FPS261 FPS
medium226 FPS216 FPS
high172 FPS167 FPS
ultra153 FPS147 FPS
4K
low189 FPS182 FPS
medium157 FPS150 FPS
high119 FPS115 FPS
ultra107 FPS102 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 9 7945HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
1080p
low744 FPS667 FPS
medium620 FPS575 FPS
high466 FPS433 FPS
ultra397 FPS375 FPS
1440p
low630 FPS562 FPS
medium541 FPS501 FPS
high419 FPS391 FPS
ultra328 FPS312 FPS
4K
low355 FPS317 FPS
medium309 FPS287 FPS
high272 FPS254 FPS
ultra230 FPS218 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 9 7945HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
1080p
low893 FPS776 FPS
medium712 FPS609 FPS
high618 FPS529 FPS
ultra533 FPS447 FPS
1440p
low718 FPS674 FPS
medium572 FPS536 FPS
high487 FPS462 FPS
ultra418 FPS392 FPS
4K
low513 FPS482 FPS
medium427 FPS399 FPS
high383 FPS357 FPS
ultra323 FPS300 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 9 7945HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
1080p
low1129 FPS1050 FPS
medium1006 FPS947 FPS
high873 FPS827 FPS
ultra768 FPS745 FPS
1440p
low900 FPS834 FPS
medium790 FPS742 FPS
high689 FPS648 FPS
ultra584 FPS562 FPS
4K
low648 FPS613 FPS
medium578 FPS550 FPS
high510 FPS484 FPS
ultra436 FPS418 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD

Ryzen 9 7945HX

The Ryzen 9 7945HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023-03-12. It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,425 points. Launch price was $700.

AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7945HX versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7945HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7945HX uses the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 54,425 against the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 55,025 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen 9 7945HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+6%
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
4 nm-20%
Architecture
Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark
54,425
55,025+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
34,521
Geekbench 6 Single
2,774
Geekbench 6 Multi
16,214
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7945HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7945HX versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports up to 128 of RAM compared to 64 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7945HX) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7945HX) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — the Ryzen 9 7945HX offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 7945HX) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395).

FeatureRyzen 9 7945HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
Socket
FL1
FP11
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
8000+159900%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+52428700%
128
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28+75%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7945HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). Both include integrated graphics Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 7945HX) and AMD Radeon 8060S (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7945HX targets Extreme Gaming / Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7945HX rivals Core i9-14900HX; Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.

FeatureRyzen 9 7945HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 610M
AMD Radeon 8060S
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use
Extreme Gaming / Mobile Workstation