PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 108.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 32.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 29,462).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

2018

Why buy it

✅+31.4% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($899 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 108.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 32.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+31.4% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 29,462).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($899 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2950X better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, the two CPUs are effectively a wash in the available data.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is the better fit. You are getting 31.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 173.3% more expensive on MSRP at $899 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 108.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 32.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	200 FPS	200 FPS
medium	163 FPS	175 FPS
high	137 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	157 FPS
medium	121 FPS	131 FPS
high	100 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	83 FPS
medium	71 FPS	74 FPS
high	56 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	46 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	561 FPS	532 FPS
medium	525 FPS	463 FPS
high	428 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	351 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	471 FPS
medium	471 FPS	417 FPS
high	394 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	302 FPS
medium	304 FPS	267 FPS
high	274 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	213 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	561 FPS	737 FPS
medium	561 FPS	630 FPS
high	561 FPS	584 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	509 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	632 FPS
medium	561 FPS	525 FPS
high	538 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	410 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	461 FPS
medium	394 FPS	371 FPS
high	343 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	274 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	561 FPS	737 FPS
medium	561 FPS	737 FPS
high	561 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	636 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	737 FPS
medium	561 FPS	667 FPS
high	561 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	500 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	515 FPS
medium	501 FPS	468 FPS
high	447 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	364 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X's 29,462 — a 27.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. Both processors carry 32 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+3%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	32 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	22,430	29,462+31%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,444
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	8,814

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Socket	AM4	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X debuted at $899. On MSRP ($329 vs $899), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $570 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 32.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 70.1% better value option.