
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.4 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($479 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,966 vs 43,174).
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅+8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9800X3D across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 83.4 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
2024Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.4 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($479 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,966 vs 43,174).
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9800X3D across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 83.4 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 better than Ryzen 7 9800X3D?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 880 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 654 FPS |
| medium | 591 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 264 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 944 FPS | 1021 FPS |
| medium | 772 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 698 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 731 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 635 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 342 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 1079 FPS |
| medium | 999 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 907 FPS | 912 FPS |
| ultra | 811 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 778 FPS | 788 FPS |
| high | 685 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 592 FPS | 605 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 639 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390


Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 November 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 39,966 points. Launch price was $479.


Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D (base: 4.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D scores 39,966 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 7.7% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+4% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+47% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total)+50% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 39,966 | 43,174+8% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 23,277 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,450 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: X670E,B650E,X870E,B850 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 8000+159900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+157286300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) and AMD Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 9800X3D targets Extreme Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 9800X3D rivals Core i9-14900K; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Extreme Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D launched at $479 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 debuted at $600. On MSRP ($479 vs $600), the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is $121 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 9800X3D delivers 83.4 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the Ryzen 7 9800X3D the 14.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479-20% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.4+16% | 72.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












