
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 5 330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +59.7% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 86.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 36.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 330 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI 5 330
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,794 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen AI 5 330
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +59.7% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 86.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 36.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 330 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,794 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen AI 5 330?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen AI 5 330


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen AI 5 330
Ryzen AI 5 330
The Ryzen AI 5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 12,794 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 330 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 330 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses Krackan Point 2 (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen AI 5 330's 12,794 — a 54.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 4 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 330.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Krackan Point 2 (2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430+75% | 12,794 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 debuted at $350. On MSRP ($329 vs $350), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $21 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 36.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI 5 330 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 60.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-6% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+86% | 36.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











