Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon Silver 4410T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 150W, a 142W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Silver 4410T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 26 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4410T, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon Silver 4410T

2023

Why buy it

✅+64.1% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,245 vs 27,318).
❌1775% higher power demand at 150W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

2023

Xeon Silver 4410T

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 150W, a 142W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Silver 4410T needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+64.1% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 26 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4410T, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,245 vs 27,318).
❌1775% higher power demand at 150W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Xeon Silver 4410T?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Silver 4410T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Benchmark Check

Xeon Silver 4410T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	Xeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low	269 FPS	181 FPS
medium	243 FPS	149 FPS
high	204 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	236 FPS	145 FPS
medium	193 FPS	114 FPS
high	157 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	164 FPS	67 FPS
medium	136 FPS	56 FPS
high	105 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Open Xeon Silver 4410T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	Xeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low	511 FPS	460 FPS
medium	421 FPS	394 FPS
high	363 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	323 FPS	272 FPS
1440p
low	447 FPS	389 FPS
medium	388 FPS	345 FPS
high	334 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	285 FPS	240 FPS
4K
low	295 FPS	250 FPS
medium	267 FPS	225 FPS
high	253 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	217 FPS	167 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Open Xeon Silver 4410T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	Xeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low	683 FPS	681 FPS
medium	683 FPS	681 FPS
high	647 FPS	681 FPS
ultra	546 FPS	681 FPS
1440p
low	683 FPS	681 FPS
medium	637 FPS	681 FPS
high	541 FPS	681 FPS
ultra	464 FPS	610 FPS
4K
low	541 FPS	532 FPS
medium	473 FPS	434 FPS
high	419 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	355 FPS	307 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Open Xeon Silver 4410T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	Xeon Silver 4410T
1080p
low	683 FPS	681 FPS
medium	683 FPS	681 FPS
high	683 FPS	681 FPS
ultra	683 FPS	592 FPS
1440p
low	683 FPS	681 FPS
medium	683 FPS	605 FPS
high	660 FPS	523 FPS
ultra	573 FPS	454 FPS
4K
low	572 FPS	479 FPS
medium	511 FPS	430 FPS
high	457 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	333 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Open Xeon Silver 4410T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Xeon Silver 4410T

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Silver 4410T

The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Silver 4410T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS scores 27,318 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	Xeon Silver 4410T
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+30%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+48%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	26.25 MB+64%
L2 Cache	8 MB+300%	2 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	27,318	27,245
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,605	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,348	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	Xeon Silver 4410T
Socket	FP7/FP8	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4410T). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Silver 4410T requires a dedicated GPU.