
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,318 vs 27,565).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
2023Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,318 vs 27,565).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 better than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 645 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS


Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,565 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 scores 27,565 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB+700% |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 27,565 | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 7645) / Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











