
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Popular choices:

Xeon W-3323
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 310.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.4 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 220W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,565 vs 27,822).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3323, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon W-3323
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 120.4 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌238.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
2023Xeon W-3323
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 310.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.4 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 220W, a 155W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,565 vs 27,822).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3323, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 120.4 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌238.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 better than Xeon W-3323?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 162 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 696 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 273 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 696 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 602 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 533 FPS |
| ultra | 645 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 338 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 and Xeon W-3323


Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,565 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323
The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3323 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-3323 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3323 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 scores 27,565 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-3323. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+31% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+9% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+78% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 27,565 | 27,822 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3323 debuted at $949. On MSRP ($229 vs $949), the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is $720 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 delivers 120.4 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3323 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 the 121.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-76% | $949 |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.4+311% | 29.3 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











