
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5317
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $859 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,088 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 377.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.4 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,088 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5317, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon Gold 5317
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,448 vs 27,565).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 120.4 PassMark/$ ($1,088 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
2023Xeon Gold 5317
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $859 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,088 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 377.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.4 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,088 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5317, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,448 vs 27,565).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 120.4 PassMark/$ ($1,088 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 better than Xeon Gold 5317?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 127 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 686 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 686 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 641 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 519 FPS |
| ultra | 645 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 330 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 and Xeon Gold 5317


Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,565 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 5317
Xeon Gold 5317
The Xeon Gold 5317 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,448 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5317 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 5317 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5317 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5317 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 scores 27,565 against the Xeon Gold 5317's 27,448 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5317.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+42% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+27% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+78% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 27,565 | 27,448 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5317 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5317 debuted at $1088. On MSRP ($229 vs $1088), the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is $859 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 delivers 120.4 pts/$ vs 25.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5317 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 the 130.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-79% | $1088 |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.4+378% | 25.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











