
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Xeon W-1370 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,781 vs 22,948).
Xeon W-1370
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Xeon W-1370
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Xeon W-1370 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,781 vs 22,948).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1370 better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 276 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 570 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 574 FPS |
| ultra | 570 FPS | 574 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 570 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 574 FPS |
| ultra | 513 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and Xeon W-1370


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1370
Xeon W-1370
The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and Xeon W-1370 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 — a 4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon W-1370 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS scores 22,781 against the Xeon W-1370's 22,948 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-1370. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+14% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 22,781 | 22,948 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,670 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,903 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,609 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1370 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS) / not specified (Xeon W-1370). The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Xeon W-1370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











