
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6248R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
2022Why buy it
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6248R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,549 vs 35,434).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6248R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6248R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,700 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
2022Xeon Gold 6248R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6248R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,549 vs 35,434).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6248R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,700 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6248R better than Ryzen 9 PRO 5945?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Xeon Gold 6248R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Xeon Gold 6248R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 544 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 156 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Xeon Gold 6248R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 845 FPS | 886 FPS |
| medium | 670 FPS | 886 FPS |
| high | 586 FPS | 865 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 801 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 709 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 666 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 480 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 398 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Xeon Gold 6248R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 864 FPS | 886 FPS |
| medium | 864 FPS | 886 FPS |
| high | 836 FPS | 841 FPS |
| ultra | 743 FPS | 713 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 864 FPS | 886 FPS |
| medium | 757 FPS | 776 FPS |
| high | 661 FPS | 654 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 414 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and Xeon Gold 6248R


Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 34,549 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6248R
Xeon Gold 6248R
The Xeon Gold 6248R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,434 points. Launch price was $2,700.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6248R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6248R has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248R — a 16.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6248R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 34,549 against the Xeon Gold 6248R's 35,434 — a 2.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6248R. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248R.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Xeon Gold 6248R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+18% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+79% | 35.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 24 MB+4700% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 34,549 | 35,434+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 23,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,175 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6248R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6248R — the Xeon Gold 6248R supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6248R supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6248R). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6248R) — the Xeon Gold 6248R offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6248R).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Xeon Gold 6248R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 2933+73225% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+13107100% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6248R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6248R). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 rivals Core i9-12900; Xeon Gold 6248R rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Xeon Gold 6248R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












