
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,246 vs 23,200).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
2022Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,246 vs 23,200).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 better than Ryzen AI 9 HX 375?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 544 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 115 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 845 FPS | 738 FPS |
| medium | 670 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 586 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 480 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 398 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 864 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 864 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 836 FPS | 694 FPS |
| ultra | 743 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 864 FPS | 757 FPS |
| medium | 757 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 661 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375


Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 34,549 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 34,549 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 34,585 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 23,200 vs 22,246 (4.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,175 vs 2,865, a 27.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,500 vs 15,100 (18.8% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+300% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| PassMark | 34,549 | 34,585 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 23,200+4% | 22,246 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,175 | 2,865+32% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,500 | 15,100+21% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 versus LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) and SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 targets High-end Gaming, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 rivals Core i9-12900; Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | High-end Gaming | AI-Notebook |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












