Ryzen 9 8945H vs Xeon 6357P

AMD

Ryzen 9 8945H

8 Cores16 Thrd8 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon 6357P

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 8945H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 8W instead of 80W, a 72W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon 6357P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 18,000).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Xeon 6357P

2025

Why buy it

  • +2.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8945H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 900% higher power demand at 80W vs 8W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 8945H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6357P better than Ryzen 9 8945H?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6357P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 8945H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6357P is the better fit. You are getting 2.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon 6357P still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon 6357P is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 2.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6357P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 9 8945HXeon 6357P
1080p
low269 FPS257 FPS
medium243 FPS246 FPS
high204 FPS205 FPS
ultra176 FPS176 FPS
1440p
low236 FPS222 FPS
medium193 FPS190 FPS
high157 FPS152 FPS
ultra139 FPS133 FPS
4K
low164 FPS153 FPS
medium136 FPS130 FPS
high105 FPS99 FPS
ultra92 FPS88 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 9 8945HXeon 6357P
1080p
low513 FPS618 FPS
medium421 FPS523 FPS
high363 FPS442 FPS
ultra323 FPS408 FPS
1440p
low448 FPS531 FPS
medium388 FPS467 FPS
high334 FPS398 FPS
ultra285 FPS346 FPS
4K
low295 FPS310 FPS
medium267 FPS278 FPS
high253 FPS265 FPS
ultra217 FPS233 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 9 8945HXeon 6357P
1080p
low756 FPS646 FPS
medium756 FPS529 FPS
high647 FPS466 FPS
ultra546 FPS404 FPS
1440p
low756 FPS588 FPS
medium637 FPS489 FPS
high541 FPS425 FPS
ultra464 FPS369 FPS
4K
low541 FPS424 FPS
medium473 FPS369 FPS
high419 FPS335 FPS
ultra355 FPS285 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 9 8945HXeon 6357P
1080p
low756 FPS760 FPS
medium756 FPS760 FPS
high756 FPS726 FPS
ultra754 FPS652 FPS
1440p
low756 FPS760 FPS
medium756 FPS704 FPS
high660 FPS609 FPS
ultra573 FPS536 FPS
4K
low572 FPS537 FPS
medium511 FPS490 FPS
high457 FPS439 FPS
ultra394 FPS383 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 8945H and Xeon 6357P

AMD

Ryzen 9 8945H

The Ryzen 9 8945H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,240 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon 6357P

The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 9 8945H and Xeon 6357P share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8945H versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8945H (base: 4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 8945H uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6357P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 8945H scores 30,240 against the Xeon 6357P's 30,401 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon 6357P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,500 vs 18,000 (2.8% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,617 vs 2,784, a 6.2% lead for the Xeon 6357P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,662 vs 12,769 (0.8% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 8945H vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P.

FeatureRyzen 9 8945HXeon 6357P
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+2%
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+33%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB
24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
8 MB+300%
2 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-43%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
30,240
30,401
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,500
18,000+3%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,617
2,784+6%
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,662
12,769
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 8945H uses the FP7/FP7r2/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6357P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 8945H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 8945H) and Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P).

FeatureRyzen 9 8945HXeon 6357P
Socket
FP7/FP7r2/FP8
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+100%
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 8945H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6357P). The Ryzen 9 8945H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon 6357P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 8945H targets Gaming, Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 8945H rivals Core i9-13900H; Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700.

FeatureRyzen 9 8945HXeon 6357P
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming
Edge Server / Workstation