
Ryzen 9 8945H
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 365
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 8945H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 28W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Ryzen AI 9 365
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8945H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,187 vs 30,240).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 8945H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌250% higher power demand at 28W vs 8W.
Ryzen 9 8945H
2023Ryzen AI 9 365
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 28W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8945H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,187 vs 30,240).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 8945H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌250% higher power demand at 28W vs 8W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 8945H better than Ryzen AI 9 365?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 8945H | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 8945H | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 229 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 267 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 135 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 8945H | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 756 FPS | 755 FPS |
| medium | 756 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 647 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 756 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 637 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 8945H | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 756 FPS | 755 FPS |
| medium | 756 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 756 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 754 FPS | 603 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 756 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 756 FPS | 660 FPS |
| high | 660 FPS | 568 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 367 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 8945H and Ryzen AI 9 365


Ryzen 9 8945H
Ryzen 9 8945H
The Ryzen 9 8945H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,240 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365
The Ryzen AI 9 365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,187 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 8945H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 365 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8945H versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 365 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8945H (base: 4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 8945H uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 8945H scores 30,240 against the Ryzen AI 9 365's 30,187 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 8945H. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 8945H vs 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 365.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 8945H | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+4% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+100% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 30,240 | 30,187 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,617 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,662 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 8945H uses the FP7/FP7r2/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 8945H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 8945H | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+300% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 8945H) and Radeon 880M (Ryzen AI 9 365) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 8945H targets Gaming, Ryzen AI 9 365 targets Mobile AI. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 8945H rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 8945H | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | Radeon 880M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mobile AI |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












