
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Popular choices:

Xeon w7-3545
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+89.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 68 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 310W, a 255W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Xeon w7-3545 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3545 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,803 vs 58,453).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3545, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
Xeon w7-3545
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (68 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,039 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌463.6% higher power demand at 310W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2023Xeon w7-3545
2023Why buy it
- ✅+89.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 68 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 310W, a 255W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Xeon w7-3545 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3545 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,803 vs 58,453).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3545, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (68 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,039 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌463.6% higher power demand at 310W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w7-3545 better than Ryzen 9 7945HX3D?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 106 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 682 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 1077 FPS | 1057 FPS |
| high | 1022 FPS | 974 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 834 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 1001 FPS |
| medium | 805 FPS | 888 FPS |
| high | 740 FPS | 802 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 397 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1051 FPS | 1212 FPS |
| medium | 951 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 833 FPS | 925 FPS |
| ultra | 745 FPS | 809 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 831 FPS | 980 FPS |
| medium | 736 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 645 FPS | 736 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 635 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 607 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 544 FPS | 632 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 557 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7945HX3D and Xeon w7-3545


Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023-07-27. It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,803 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon w7-3545
Xeon w7-3545
The Xeon w7-3545 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 310 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 58,453 points. Launch price was $2,039.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-3545 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon w7-3545 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3545 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D uses the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w7-3545 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 57,803 against the Xeon w7-3545's 58,453 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon w7-3545. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3545.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+13% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.7 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+90% | 67.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 57,803 | 58,453+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 16,200 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3545 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3545 — the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3545 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3545). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3545) — the Xeon w7-3545 offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3545).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+103900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096 GB+3355443100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 112+300% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D) vs true (Xeon w7-3545). The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the Xeon w7-3545 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7945HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX; Xeon w7-3545 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D launched at $0 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3545 debuted at $2039. On MSRP ($0 vs $2039), the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is $2039 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2039 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 28.7 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












