
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Popular choices:

Xeon W-3365
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 270W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Xeon W-3365 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3365, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3365
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7945HX3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,312 vs 57,803).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $3,499 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌390.9% higher power demand at 270W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2023Xeon W-3365
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 270W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Xeon W-3365 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3365, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7945HX3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,312 vs 57,803).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $3,499 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌390.9% higher power demand at 270W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7945HX3D better than Xeon W-3365?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 1077 FPS | 972 FPS |
| high | 1022 FPS | 913 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 826 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 841 FPS |
| medium | 805 FPS | 744 FPS |
| high | 740 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 320 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1051 FPS | 932 FPS |
| medium | 951 FPS | 847 FPS |
| high | 833 FPS | 732 FPS |
| ultra | 745 FPS | 635 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 831 FPS | 732 FPS |
| medium | 736 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 645 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 607 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 544 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7945HX3D and Xeon W-3365


Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023-07-27. It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,803 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3365
Xeon W-3365
The Xeon W-3365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,312 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3365 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon W-3365 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3365 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D uses the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3365 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 57,803 against the Xeon W-3365's 57,312 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3365.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+35% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.7 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+167% | 48 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 57,803 | 57,312 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 16,817 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3365 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3365 — the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3365 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D) vs 8 (Xeon W-3365). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D) vs 64 (Xeon W-3365) — the Xeon W-3365 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3365).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+129900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096 GB+3355443100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D) vs true (Xeon W-3365). The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the Xeon W-3365 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7945HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX; Xeon W-3365 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D launched at $0 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3365 debuted at $3499. On MSRP ($0 vs $3499), the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is $3499 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 16.4 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












