Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen AI 9 365

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 365

10 Cores20 Thrd28 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +28.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen AI 9 365.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (29,986 vs 30,187).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
  • 25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.

Ryzen AI 9 365

2024

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7940HS.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 365 better than Ryzen 9 7940HS?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 9 7940HS is ahead with a 28.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 365 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Ryzen AI 9 365 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 365 is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen AI 9 365 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen AI 9 365 is at an unclear MSRP at $400 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 9 7940HS is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 28.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (75.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 9 365 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 9 7940HSRyzen AI 9 365
1080p
low267 FPS246 FPS
medium242 FPS231 FPS
high203 FPS194 FPS
ultra176 FPS166 FPS
1440p
low235 FPS216 FPS
medium193 FPS184 FPS
high157 FPS148 FPS
ultra139 FPS130 FPS
4K
low163 FPS150 FPS
medium136 FPS128 FPS
high105 FPS98 FPS
ultra92 FPS86 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 9 7940HSRyzen AI 9 365
1080p
low497 FPS349 FPS
medium408 FPS297 FPS
high349 FPS253 FPS
ultra311 FPS229 FPS
1440p
low434 FPS302 FPS
medium376 FPS268 FPS
high322 FPS229 FPS
ultra274 FPS196 FPS
4K
low286 FPS180 FPS
medium259 FPS162 FPS
high243 FPS155 FPS
ultra209 FPS135 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 9 7940HSRyzen AI 9 365
1080p
low750 FPS755 FPS
medium750 FPS598 FPS
high730 FPS525 FPS
ultra624 FPS441 FPS
1440p
low750 FPS677 FPS
medium646 FPS539 FPS
high545 FPS467 FPS
ultra467 FPS398 FPS
4K
low544 FPS491 FPS
medium475 FPS408 FPS
high422 FPS363 FPS
ultra357 FPS303 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 9 7940HSRyzen AI 9 365
1080p
low750 FPS755 FPS
medium750 FPS755 FPS
high750 FPS677 FPS
ultra750 FPS603 FPS
1440p
low750 FPS740 FPS
medium750 FPS660 FPS
high658 FPS568 FPS
ultra573 FPS496 FPS
4K
low574 FPS519 FPS
medium511 FPS473 FPS
high456 FPS419 FPS
ultra394 FPS367 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen AI 9 365

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 365

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,187 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 365 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 365 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940HS scores 29,986 against the Ryzen AI 9 365's 30,187 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 365. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS vs 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 365.

FeatureRyzen 9 7940HSRyzen AI 9 365
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+4%
5 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+100%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Strix Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
29,986
30,187
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,443
Geekbench 6 Single
2,646
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,591
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FP8 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7940HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.

FeatureRyzen 9 7940HSRyzen AI 9 365
Socket
FP8
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+300%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940HS) and Radeon 880M (Ryzen AI 9 365) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance, Ryzen AI 9 365 targets Mobile AI. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H.

FeatureRyzen 9 7940HSRyzen AI 9 365
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Radeon 880M
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Thin-and-light Performance
Mobile AI