PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7282

2019

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 17,443).
❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +41.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while EPYC 7282 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike EPYC 7282.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7282, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7282

2019

Ryzen 9 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +41.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while EPYC 7282 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike EPYC 7282.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 17,443).
❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7282, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7940HS better than EPYC 7282?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7282 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7940HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7940HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 41.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7940HS is the better fit. You are getting 29.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7940HS is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7282 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 7940HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $650 MSRP, and it gives you a 41.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7282 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (46.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7940HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7282 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 7940HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7282	Ryzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low	159 FPS	267 FPS
medium	129 FPS	242 FPS
high	108 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	140 FPS	235 FPS
medium	112 FPS	193 FPS
high	89 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	163 FPS
medium	57 FPS	136 FPS
high	45 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	92 FPS

Open EPYC 7282 Open Ryzen 9 7940HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7282	Ryzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low	419 FPS	497 FPS
medium	371 FPS	408 FPS
high	305 FPS	349 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	311 FPS
1440p
low	353 FPS	434 FPS
medium	319 FPS	376 FPS
high	270 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	208 FPS	274 FPS
4K
low	219 FPS	286 FPS
medium	201 FPS	259 FPS
high	171 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	209 FPS

Open EPYC 7282 Open Ryzen 9 7940HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7282	Ryzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low	632 FPS	750 FPS
medium	514 FPS	750 FPS
high	458 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	402 FPS	624 FPS
1440p
low	493 FPS	750 FPS
medium	400 FPS	646 FPS
high	351 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	305 FPS	467 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	544 FPS
medium	285 FPS	475 FPS
high	243 FPS	422 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	357 FPS

Open EPYC 7282 Open Ryzen 9 7940HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7282	Ryzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low	755 FPS	750 FPS
medium	755 FPS	750 FPS
high	664 FPS	750 FPS
ultra	581 FPS	750 FPS
1440p
low	663 FPS	750 FPS
medium	584 FPS	750 FPS
high	501 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	475 FPS	574 FPS
medium	428 FPS	511 FPS
high	376 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	323 FPS	394 FPS

Open EPYC 7282 Open Ryzen 9 7940HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 9 7940HS

EPYC 7282

The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7282 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7282 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 7282 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7282 scores 30,201 against the Ryzen 9 7940HS's 29,986 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7282. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,500 vs 17,443 (25.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,086 vs 2,646, a 83.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,638 vs 11,591 (41.1% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS). L3 cache: 64 MB on the EPYC 7282 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS.

Feature	EPYC 7282	Ryzen 9 7940HS
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	5.2 GHz+63%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	4 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	64 MB+300%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	30,201	29,986
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,500	17,443+29%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,086	2,646+144%
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,638	11,591+52%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7282 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7282) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7940HS). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7282) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) — the EPYC 7282 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS).

Feature	EPYC 7282	Ryzen 9 7940HS
Socket	SP3	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+1500%	256 GB
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+540%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HS). The Ryzen 9 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the EPYC 7282 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server, Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance. Direct competitor: EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216; Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H.

Feature	EPYC 7282	Ryzen 9 7940HS
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 780M
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV	AMD-V
Target Use	Edge Server / Entry Server	Thin-and-light Performance