
EPYC 7282
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6246R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7282
2019Why buy it
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6246R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 16,000).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6246R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6246R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +46.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
EPYC 7282
2019Xeon Gold 6246R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +46.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6246R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 16,000).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6246R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6246R better than EPYC 7282?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 762 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 762 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 720 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 596 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 755 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 755 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 762 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 739 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 568 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7282 and Xeon Gold 6246R

EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282
The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

Xeon Gold 6246R
Xeon Gold 6246R
The Xeon Gold 6246R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,468 points. Launch price was $3,286.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7282 and Xeon Gold 6246R share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6246R — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 7282 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6246R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7282 scores 30,201 against the Xeon Gold 6246R's 30,468 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,500 vs 16,000 (16.9% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,086 vs 1,293, a 17.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,638 vs 9,848 (25.3% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R). L3 cache: 64 MB on the EPYC 7282 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6246R.
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.1 GHz+28% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+79% | 35.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 16 MB+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,201 | 30,468 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,500 | 16,000+19% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,086 | 1,293+19% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,638 | 9,848+29% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7282 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6246R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7282) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6246R). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7282) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6246R) — the EPYC 7282 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282) and Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6246R).
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+300% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+167% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6246R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6246R). Primary use case: EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server, Xeon Gold 6246R targets High-frequency Server / Financial. Direct competitor: EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216; Xeon Gold 6246R rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Edge Server / Entry Server | High-frequency Server / Financial |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













