PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7282

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7371 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 15,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while EPYC 7371 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7371

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.

EPYC 7282

2019

EPYC 7371

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7371 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 15,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while EPYC 7371 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7371 better than EPYC 7282?

Yes. EPYC 7371 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 11.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7371 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7371 is the better fit. You are getting 11.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7371 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7282 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 7371 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $650 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7282 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (46.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7282 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7282 Benchmark Check

EPYC 7371 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7282	EPYC 7371
1080p
low	159 FPS	193 FPS
medium	129 FPS	168 FPS
high	108 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	140 FPS	159 FPS
medium	112 FPS	132 FPS
high	89 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	72 FPS
medium	57 FPS	64 FPS
high	45 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 7282 Open EPYC 7371

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7282	EPYC 7371
1080p
low	419 FPS	426 FPS
medium	371 FPS	383 FPS
high	305 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	269 FPS
1440p
low	353 FPS	367 FPS
medium	319 FPS	334 FPS
high	270 FPS	283 FPS
ultra	208 FPS	230 FPS
4K
low	219 FPS	229 FPS
medium	201 FPS	211 FPS
high	171 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	159 FPS

Open EPYC 7282 Open EPYC 7371

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7282	EPYC 7371
1080p
low	632 FPS	634 FPS
medium	514 FPS	531 FPS
high	458 FPS	490 FPS
ultra	402 FPS	416 FPS
1440p
low	493 FPS	522 FPS
medium	400 FPS	436 FPS
high	351 FPS	393 FPS
ultra	305 FPS	336 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	386 FPS
medium	285 FPS	310 FPS
high	243 FPS	280 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	227 FPS

Open EPYC 7282 Open EPYC 7371

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7282	EPYC 7371
1080p
low	755 FPS	754 FPS
medium	755 FPS	754 FPS
high	664 FPS	688 FPS
ultra	581 FPS	609 FPS
1440p
low	663 FPS	701 FPS
medium	584 FPS	617 FPS
high	501 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	455 FPS
4K
low	475 FPS	502 FPS
medium	428 FPS	452 FPS
high	376 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	323 FPS	345 FPS

Open EPYC 7282 Open EPYC 7371

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7282 and EPYC 7371

EPYC 7282

The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7282 and EPYC 7371 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 7371 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 7282 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 7371 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7282 scores 30,201 against the EPYC 7371's 30,156 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7282. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,500 vs 15,000 (10.5% advantage for the EPYC 7371). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,086 vs 1,216, a 11.3% lead for the EPYC 7371 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,638 vs 6,941 (9.6% advantage for the EPYC 7282). L3 cache: 64 MB on the EPYC 7282 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371.

Feature	EPYC 7282	EPYC 7371
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.8 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	64 MB	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8 MB+1500%	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	30,201	30,156
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,500	15,000+11%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,086	1,216+12%
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,638+10%	6,941

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7282 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7371 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282) and SP3 platform (EPYC 7371).

Feature	EPYC 7282	EPYC 7371
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+100%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 7371 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282) vs AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371). Primary use case: EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server, EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216; EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134.