
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Popular choices:

Xeon 6736P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,752 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 461.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.8 vs 14.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6736P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6736P, which brings 36 cores / 72 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Xeon 6736P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 36 cores / 72 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,072 vs 50,213).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 83.8 PassMark/$ ($3,351 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7900X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
2023Xeon 6736P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,752 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 461.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.8 vs 14.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6736P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 36 cores / 72 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6736P, which brings 36 cores / 72 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,072 vs 50,213).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 83.8 PassMark/$ ($3,351 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7900X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7900X3D better than Xeon 6736P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7900X3D | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7900X3D | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 845 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 125 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7900X3D | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 900 FPS |
| medium | 1164 FPS | 829 FPS |
| high | 1101 FPS | 768 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 677 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 972 FPS | 770 FPS |
| medium | 878 FPS | 706 FPS |
| high | 805 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 429 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 318 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7900X3D | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1255 FPS | 972 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 876 FPS |
| high | 993 FPS | 755 FPS |
| ultra | 865 FPS | 655 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1037 FPS | 792 FPS |
| medium | 899 FPS | 690 FPS |
| high | 774 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 649 FPS | 509 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 761 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 664 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 578 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon 6736P


Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 50,213 points. Launch price was $599.

Xeon 6736P
Xeon 6736P
The Xeon 6736P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 50,072 points. Launch price was $3,351.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6736P offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon 6736P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7900X3D versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6736P — a 30.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7900X3D uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6736P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores 50,213 against the Xeon 6736P's 50,072 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7900X3D vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6736P.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7900X3D | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 36 / 72+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+37% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+120% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 144 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | Intel 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 50,213 | 50,072 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6736P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the Ryzen 9 7900X3D versus 6400 on the Xeon 6736P — the Xeon 6736P supports 20.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6736P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7900X3D) vs 8 (Xeon 6736P). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7900X3D) vs 88 (Xeon 6736P) — the Xeon 6736P offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (Ryzen 9 7900X3D) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6736P).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7900X3D | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200 | 6400+23% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 88+214% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7900X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7900X3D) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6736P). The Ryzen 9 7900X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6736P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7900X3D rivals Core i7-14700K; Xeon 6736P rivals EPYC 9684X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7900X3D | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D launched at $599 MSRP, while the Xeon 6736P debuted at $3351. On MSRP ($599 vs $3351), the Ryzen 9 7900X3D is $2752 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 7900X3D delivers 83.8 pts/$ vs 14.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6736P — making the Ryzen 9 7900X3D the 139.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7900X3D | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-82% | $3351 |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.8+462% | 14.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












