
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Popular choices:

Xeon w5-2465X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7845HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+89.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 34 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon w5-2465X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon w5-2465X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2465X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (44,940 vs 45,240).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-2465X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
Xeon w5-2465X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (34 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,389 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7845HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7845HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7845HX.
Ryzen 9 7845HX
2023Xeon w5-2465X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+89.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 34 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon w5-2465X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon w5-2465X.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2465X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (44,940 vs 45,240).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-2465X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (34 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,389 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7845HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7845HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7845HX.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w5-2465X better than Ryzen 9 7845HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon w5-2465X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon w5-2465X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 767 FPS | 589 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 644 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 239 FPS | 220 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon w5-2465X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 896 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 1131 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 1131 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 574 FPS | 953 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 859 FPS |
| ultra | 419 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 656 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 419 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon w5-2465X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1124 FPS | 1131 FPS |
| medium | 1006 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 873 FPS | 901 FPS |
| ultra | 770 FPS | 784 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 926 FPS |
| medium | 791 FPS | 795 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 700 FPS |
| ultra | 586 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon w5-2465X


Ryzen 9 7845HX
Ryzen 9 7845HX
The Ryzen 9 7845HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,940 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon w5-2465X
Xeon w5-2465X
The Xeon w5-2465X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33.75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,240 points. Launch price was $1,389.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7845HX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w5-2465X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon w5-2465X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7845HX versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon w5-2465X — a 10.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7845HX (base: 3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7845HX uses the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm), while the Xeon w5-2465X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 44,940 against the Xeon w5-2465X's 45,240 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon w5-2465X. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7845HX vs 33.75 MB on the Xeon w5-2465X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon w5-2465X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+11% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+90% | 33.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 44,940 | 45,240 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 26,654 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,697 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,039 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7845HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-2465X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7845HX versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-2465X — the Xeon w5-2465X supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-2465X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 64 GB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) vs 8 (Xeon w5-2465X). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) vs 112 (Xeon w5-2465X) — the Xeon w5-2465X offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) and W790 (Xeon w5-2465X).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon w5-2465X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+1638300% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 112+300% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7845HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-2465X). The Ryzen 9 7845HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon w5-2465X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7845HX targets High-end Gaming / Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7845HX rivals Core i9-13900HX; Xeon w5-2465X rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon w5-2465X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Gaming / Content Creation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












