
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8352M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7845HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 185W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon Platinum 8352M needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8352M, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Platinum 8352M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7845HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (44,406 vs 44,940).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $4,471 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7845HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌236.4% higher power demand at 185W vs 55W.
Ryzen 9 7845HX
2023Xeon Platinum 8352M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 185W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon Platinum 8352M needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8352M, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7845HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (44,406 vs 44,940).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $4,471 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7845HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌236.4% higher power demand at 185W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7845HX better than Xeon Platinum 8352M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 767 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 644 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 239 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 896 FPS | 971 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 849 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 803 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 712 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 574 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 419 FPS | 560 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 393 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1124 FPS | 900 FPS |
| medium | 1006 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 873 FPS | 705 FPS |
| ultra | 770 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 791 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 586 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon Platinum 8352M


Ryzen 9 7845HX
Ryzen 9 7845HX
The Ryzen 9 7845HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,940 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Platinum 8352M
Xeon Platinum 8352M
The Xeon Platinum 8352M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 44,406 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7845HX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352M offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352M has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7845HX versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352M — a 39.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7845HX (base: 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7845HX uses the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 44,940 against the Xeon Platinum 8352M's 44,406 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 7845HX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7845HX vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8352M.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 32 / 64+167% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+49% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+30% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+33% | 48 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 44,940+1% | 44,406 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 26,654 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,697 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,039 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7845HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7845HX versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352M — the Xeon Platinum 8352M supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8352M supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 64 GB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8352M). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352M) — the Xeon Platinum 8352M offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352M).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+1638300% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7845HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7845HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352M). The Ryzen 9 7845HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7845HX targets High-end Gaming / Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7845HX rivals Core i9-13900HX; Xeon Platinum 8352M rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7845HX | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Gaming / Content Creation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












