
Ryzen 7 7735H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5980HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,300 vs 23,619).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,300 vs 23,619).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7735H better than Ryzen 9 5980HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 180 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 321 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 587 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 9 5980HX


Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
The Ryzen 7 7735H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,619 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 5980HX
Ryzen 9 5980HX
The Ryzen 9 5980HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,300 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 9 5980HX share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735H versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HX — a 1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HX (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7735H uses the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7735H scores 23,619 against the Ryzen 9 5980HX's 23,300 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735H. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.75 GHz | 4.8 GHz+1% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-14% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) | Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 23,619+1% | 23,300 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7735H uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Ryzen 7 7735H versus LPDDR4-4266 on the Ryzen 9 5980HX — the Ryzen 7 7735H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 7735H) vs 16 (Ryzen 9 5980HX) — the Ryzen 7 7735H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5980HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 680M (Ryzen 7 7735H) and Radeon Graphics (8CU) (Ryzen 9 5980HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735H targets Mobile, Ryzen 9 5980HX targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | Radeon Graphics (8CU) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mobile | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











