
Ryzen 7 7735H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,619 vs 23,934).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,619 vs 23,934).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U better than Ryzen 7 7735H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 208 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 533 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 321 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 336 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 587 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U


Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
The Ryzen 7 7735H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,619 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,934 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7735H uses the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7735H scores 23,619 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U's 23,934 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.75 GHz | 5.1 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm-33% |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 23,619 | 23,934+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,450 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,400 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,500 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FP7 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 680M (Ryzen 7 7735H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735H targets Mobile, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U rivals Core Ultra 7 164U.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mobile | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











