
Ryzen 7 7735H
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Xeon W-1390 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,619 vs 23,902).
Xeon W-1390
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7735H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Xeon W-1390
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Xeon W-1390 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,619 vs 23,902).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7735H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1390 better than Ryzen 7 7735H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 321 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 276 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 587 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7735H and Xeon W-1390


Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
The Ryzen 7 7735H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,619 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1390
Xeon W-1390
The Xeon W-1390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,902 points. Launch price was $494.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7735H and Xeon W-1390 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735H versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1390 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7735H uses the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon W-1390 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7735H scores 23,619 against the Xeon W-1390's 23,902 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon W-1390. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.75 GHz | 5.1 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+14% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 23,619 | 23,902+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7735H uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1390 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735H) / not specified (Xeon W-1390). The Ryzen 7 7735H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Xeon W-1390 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735H targets Mobile.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











