
Ryzen 9 5980HS
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1290
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Xeon W-1290 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon W-1290
2020Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,112 vs 20,257).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $498 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Xeon W-1290
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Xeon W-1290 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,112 vs 20,257).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $498 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5980HS better than Xeon W-1290?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 235 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 463 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 348 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 477 FPS | 503 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5980HS and Xeon W-1290


Ryzen 9 5980HS
Ryzen 9 5980HS
The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1290
Xeon W-1290
The Xeon W-1290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,112 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5980HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1290 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1290 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-1290 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5980HS scores 20,257 against the Xeon W-1290's 20,112 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 5980HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HS vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 20,257 | 20,112 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1290 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-4266 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS) / not specified (Xeon W-1290). The Ryzen 9 5980HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Xeon W-1290 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (8CU) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Mobile High-End | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












