Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon W-1290

AMD

Ryzen 9 5980HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-1290

10 Cores20 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 5980HS

2021

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Xeon W-1290 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon W-1290

2020

Why buy it

  • +25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (20,112 vs 20,257).
  • Launch MSRP is still $498 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5980HS better than Xeon W-1290?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1290 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5980HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5980HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 5980HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1290 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 5980HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $498 MSRP, and it gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Xeon W-1290 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-1290 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (40.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 5980HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 9 5980HSXeon W-1290
1080p
low277 FPS256 FPS
medium250 FPS239 FPS
high210 FPS201 FPS
ultra180 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low241 FPS223 FPS
medium195 FPS188 FPS
high159 FPS154 FPS
ultra140 FPS136 FPS
4K
low168 FPS156 FPS
medium138 FPS132 FPS
high106 FPS102 FPS
ultra93 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 9 5980HSXeon W-1290
1080p
low506 FPS503 FPS
medium464 FPS503 FPS
high390 FPS451 FPS
ultra342 FPS411 FPS
1440p
low485 FPS503 FPS
medium407 FPS475 FPS
high349 FPS405 FPS
ultra294 FPS353 FPS
4K
low334 FPS318 FPS
medium288 FPS282 FPS
high263 FPS270 FPS
ultra227 FPS235 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 9 5980HSXeon W-1290
1080p
low506 FPS503 FPS
medium506 FPS503 FPS
high506 FPS503 FPS
ultra506 FPS419 FPS
1440p
low506 FPS503 FPS
medium506 FPS503 FPS
high506 FPS462 FPS
ultra463 FPS382 FPS
4K
low506 FPS469 FPS
medium469 FPS403 FPS
high413 FPS360 FPS
ultra348 FPS296 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 9 5980HSXeon W-1290
1080p
low506 FPS503 FPS
medium506 FPS503 FPS
high506 FPS503 FPS
ultra506 FPS503 FPS
1440p
low506 FPS503 FPS
medium506 FPS503 FPS
high506 FPS503 FPS
ultra477 FPS503 FPS
4K
low506 FPS503 FPS
medium463 FPS487 FPS
high410 FPS435 FPS
ultra346 FPS380 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5980HS and Xeon W-1290

AMD

Ryzen 9 5980HS

The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon W-1290

The Xeon W-1290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,112 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5980HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1290 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1290 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-1290 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5980HS scores 20,257 against the Xeon W-1290's 20,112 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 5980HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HS vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290.

FeatureRyzen 9 5980HSXeon W-1290
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
5.1 GHz+6%
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.2 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
20,257
20,112
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1290 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 9 5980HSXeon W-1290
Socket
FP6
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-4266
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS) / not specified (Xeon W-1290). The Ryzen 9 5980HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Xeon W-1290 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.

FeatureRyzen 9 5980HSXeon W-1290
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics (8CU)
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile High-End