Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v4

AMD

Ryzen 9 5980HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E5-4667 v4

18 Cores36 Thrd135 WWMax: 3 GHz2016

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 5980HS

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +23.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Xeon E5-4667 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (20,257 vs 20,319).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • +181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5980HS better than Xeon E5-4667 v4?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-4667 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5980HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4667 v4 is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 5980HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 9 5980HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 23.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 5980HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 9 5980HSXeon E5-4667 v4
1080p
low277 FPS176 FPS
medium250 FPS152 FPS
high210 FPS119 FPS
ultra180 FPS95 FPS
1440p
low241 FPS147 FPS
medium195 FPS123 FPS
high159 FPS94 FPS
ultra140 FPS76 FPS
4K
low168 FPS68 FPS
medium138 FPS61 FPS
high106 FPS47 FPS
ultra93 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 9 5980HSXeon E5-4667 v4
1080p
low506 FPS210 FPS
medium464 FPS191 FPS
high390 FPS162 FPS
ultra342 FPS131 FPS
1440p
low485 FPS180 FPS
medium407 FPS164 FPS
high349 FPS142 FPS
ultra294 FPS110 FPS
4K
low334 FPS114 FPS
medium288 FPS105 FPS
high263 FPS92 FPS
ultra227 FPS73 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 9 5980HSXeon E5-4667 v4
1080p
low506 FPS508 FPS
medium506 FPS508 FPS
high506 FPS508 FPS
ultra506 FPS508 FPS
1440p
low506 FPS508 FPS
medium506 FPS508 FPS
high506 FPS508 FPS
ultra463 FPS505 FPS
4K
low506 FPS447 FPS
medium469 FPS363 FPS
high413 FPS328 FPS
ultra348 FPS274 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 9 5980HSXeon E5-4667 v4
1080p
low506 FPS508 FPS
medium506 FPS508 FPS
high506 FPS508 FPS
ultra506 FPS508 FPS
1440p
low506 FPS508 FPS
medium506 FPS508 FPS
high506 FPS508 FPS
ultra477 FPS452 FPS
4K
low506 FPS508 FPS
medium463 FPS465 FPS
high410 FPS410 FPS
ultra346 FPS352 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5980HS and Xeon E5-4667 v4

AMD

Ryzen 9 5980HS

The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E5-4667 v4

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5980HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HS (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5980HS scores 20,257 against the Xeon E5-4667 v4's 20,319 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HS vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4.

FeatureRyzen 9 5980HSXeon E5-4667 v4
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+60%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+36%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
45 MB+181%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
4.5 MB+800%
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
20,257
20,319
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 9 5980HSXeon E5-4667 v4
Socket
FP6
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-4266
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS) / not specified (Xeon E5-4667 v4). The Ryzen 9 5980HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.

FeatureRyzen 9 5980HSXeon E5-4667 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics (8CU)
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile High-End