
Ryzen 9 5980HS
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4667 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Xeon E5-4667 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,257 vs 20,319).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
Xeon E5-4667 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Xeon E5-4667 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Xeon E5-4667 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,257 vs 20,319).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5980HS better than Xeon E5-4667 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon E5-4667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon E5-4667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon E5-4667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 463 FPS | 505 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 348 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon E5-4667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 477 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 352 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5980HS and Xeon E5-4667 v4


Ryzen 9 5980HS
Ryzen 9 5980HS
The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4667 v4
Xeon E5-4667 v4
The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5980HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HS (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5980HS scores 20,257 against the Xeon E5-4667 v4's 20,319 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HS vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon E5-4667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 18 / 36+125% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+60% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 45 MB+181% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4.5 MB+800% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 20,257 | 20,319 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon E5-4667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-4266 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS) / not specified (Xeon E5-4667 v4). The Ryzen 9 5980HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Xeon E5-4667 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (8CU) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Mobile High-End | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












