
Ryzen 9 5980HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.3% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 20,257).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.3% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 20,257).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5980HS better than Ryzen Embedded V3C48?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 463 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 348 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 505 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 477 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 339 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen Embedded V3C48


Ryzen 9 5980HS
Ryzen 9 5980HS
The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen Embedded V3C48 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HS (base: 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5980HS scores 20,257 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 20,203 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5980HS. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+26% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) | Rembrandt (2022) |
| PassMark | 20,257 | 20,203 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-4266 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C48). The Ryzen 9 5980HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5980HS | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (8CU) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Mobile High-End | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












