
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 44,105).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 126.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900XT
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Delivers 85.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 126.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌6.1% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 9 5900XT
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Delivers 85.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 126.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 44,105).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 126.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌6.1% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900XT better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 325 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 228 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 839 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 594 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1073 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 972 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 850 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 846 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 491 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 425 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 5900XT


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 9 5900XT
Ryzen 9 5900XT
The Ryzen 9 5900XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 44,105 points. Launch price was $349.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900XT offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900XT has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900XT — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900XT (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900XT uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 9 5900XT's 44,105 — a 65.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900XT. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900XT.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 44,105+97% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 22,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,320 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,000 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 5900XT).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900XT). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900XT targets High End Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | High End Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900XT debuted at $349. On MSRP ($329 vs $349), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 126.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900XT — making the Ryzen 9 5900XT the 59.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-6% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2 | 126.4+85% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











