
Ryzen 9 3900
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5220R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅+29.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,281 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,780 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 259.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.3 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,780 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5220R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5220R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,327 vs 1,713).
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,372 vs 30,588).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 61.3 PassMark/$ ($1,780 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Ryzen 9 3900
2019Xeon Gold 5220R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+29.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,281 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,780 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 259.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.3 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,780 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5220R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,327 vs 1,713).
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,372 vs 30,588).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 61.3 PassMark/$ ($1,780 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 3900 better than Xeon Gold 5220R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 534 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 709 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 759 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 753 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 676 FPS |
| high | 401 FPS | 635 FPS |
| ultra | 347 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 292 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 765 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 711 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 638 FPS | 613 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 725 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 644 FPS | 628 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 486 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 351 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 3900 and Xeon Gold 5220R


Ryzen 9 3900
Ryzen 9 3900
The Ryzen 9 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,588 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 5220R
Xeon Gold 5220R
The Xeon Gold 5220R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 30,372 points. Launch price was $1,555.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 3900 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5220R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5220R has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5220R — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3900 uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 3900 scores 30,588 against the Xeon Gold 5220R's 30,372 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,713 vs 1,327, a 25.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5220R.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+79% | 35.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 24 MB+4700% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,588 | 30,372 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,713+29% | 1,327 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,983 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 3900 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 5220R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 3900) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5220R). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 3900) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5220R) — the Xeon Gold 5220R offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900) and C620 (Xeon Gold 5220R).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon Gold 5220R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900) vs Yes (Xeon Gold 5220R). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 3900 targets Workstation Desktop (low power). Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 3900 rivals Core i9-9900.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Workstation Desktop (low power) | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 3900 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5220R debuted at $1780. On MSRP ($499 vs $1780), the Ryzen 9 3900 is $1281 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 3900 delivers 61.3 pts/$ vs 17.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5220R — making the Ryzen 9 3900 the 112.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-72% | $1780 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.3+258% | 17.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












