
Core Ultra 5 225U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,555).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌250% higher power demand at 14W vs 4W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 14W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 14W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,555).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌250% higher power demand at 14W vs 4W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U better than Core Ultra 5 225U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 195 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225U and Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U

Core Ultra 5 225U
Core Ultra 5 225U
The Core Ultra 5 225U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-U Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,555 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225U versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U — a 1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U uses Rembrandt-U Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225U scores 18,434 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U's 18,555 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225U vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+1% | 4.75 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.7 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 16 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 4 MB |
| Process | 5 nm-17% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-U (2025) | Rembrandt-U Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 18,434 | 18,555 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,374 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,846 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core Ultra 5 225U) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U). The Core Ultra 5 225U includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225U rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












