
Core Ultra 5 225U
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2356G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 80W, a 66W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Xeon E-2356G needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,459).
Xeon E-2356G
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $311 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 80W vs 14W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Xeon E-2356G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 80W, a 66W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Xeon E-2356G needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,459).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $311 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 80W vs 14W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2356G better than Core Ultra 5 225U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Xeon E-2356G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Xeon E-2356G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 334 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 348 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 248 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Xeon E-2356G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 297 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Xeon E-2356G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 433 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225U and Xeon E-2356G

Core Ultra 5 225U
Core Ultra 5 225U
The Core Ultra 5 225U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2356G
Xeon E-2356G
The Xeon E-2356G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,459 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon E-2356G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225U versus 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2356G — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2356G (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E-2356G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225U scores 18,434 against the Xeon E-2356G's 18,459 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E-2356G. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225U vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2356G.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Xeon E-2356G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-U (2025) | Rocket Lake-E (2021) |
| PassMark | 18,434 | 18,459 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,374 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,846 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2356G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Xeon E-2356G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core Ultra 5 225U) / not specified (Xeon E-2356G). The Core Ultra 5 225U includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)), while the Xeon E-2356G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225U rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Xeon E-2356G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












