Core Ultra 5 225U vs Ryzen 5 6600H

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225U

12 Cores14 Thrd14 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 6600H

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 225U

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +20.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 14W instead of 45W, a 31W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Ryzen 5 6600H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,578).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 5 6600H

2022

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 221.4% higher power demand at 45W vs 14W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225U better than Ryzen 5 6600H?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core Ultra 5 225U is ahead with a 20.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 6600H pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 6600H also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 6600H is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 225U still looks like the safer overall buy. Core Ultra 5 225U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 20.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 225U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 225URyzen 5 6600H
1080p
low277 FPS167 FPS
medium248 FPS145 FPS
high210 FPS117 FPS
ultra181 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low230 FPS142 FPS
medium185 FPS122 FPS
high152 FPS98 FPS
ultra134 FPS82 FPS
4K
low161 FPS79 FPS
medium131 FPS72 FPS
high101 FPS57 FPS
ultra89 FPS45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 225URyzen 5 6600H
1080p
low420 FPS353 FPS
medium335 FPS294 FPS
high295 FPS259 FPS
ultra259 FPS228 FPS
1440p
low358 FPS306 FPS
medium296 FPS259 FPS
high266 FPS235 FPS
ultra227 FPS203 FPS
4K
low278 FPS227 FPS
medium237 FPS196 FPS
high219 FPS179 FPS
ultra188 FPS146 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 5 225URyzen 5 6600H
1080p
low461 FPS464 FPS
medium461 FPS457 FPS
high461 FPS414 FPS
ultra461 FPS344 FPS
1440p
low461 FPS464 FPS
medium461 FPS400 FPS
high461 FPS360 FPS
ultra461 FPS301 FPS
4K
low461 FPS340 FPS
medium461 FPS284 FPS
high409 FPS246 FPS
ultra342 FPS193 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 5 225URyzen 5 6600H
1080p
low461 FPS464 FPS
medium461 FPS464 FPS
high461 FPS464 FPS
ultra461 FPS464 FPS
1440p
low461 FPS464 FPS
medium461 FPS464 FPS
high461 FPS464 FPS
ultra461 FPS464 FPS
4K
low461 FPS464 FPS
medium461 FPS464 FPS
high461 FPS420 FPS
ultra410 FPS364 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225U and Ryzen 5 6600H

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225U

The Core Ultra 5 225U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 6600H

The Ryzen 5 6600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,578 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 225U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 5 6600H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225U versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600H — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 6600H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225U scores 18,434 against the Ryzen 5 6600H's 18,578 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 6600H. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600H.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225URyzen 5 6600H
Cores / Threads
12 / 14+100%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+7%
4.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
12 MB
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
5 nm-17%
6 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-U (2025)
Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark
18,434
18,578
Geekbench 6 Single
2,374
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,846
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 6600H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225URyzen 5 6600H
Socket
FCBGA2049
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core Ultra 5 225U) / not specified (Ryzen 5 6600H). The Core Ultra 5 225U includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)), while the Ryzen 5 6600H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225U rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225URyzen 5 6600H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Productivity