
Core Ultra 5 225U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 6600H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 45W, a 31W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Ryzen 5 6600H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,578).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 5 6600H
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌221.4% higher power demand at 45W vs 14W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Ryzen 5 6600H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 45W, a 31W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Ryzen 5 6600H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,578).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌221.4% higher power demand at 45W vs 14W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225U better than Ryzen 5 6600H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 193 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225U and Ryzen 5 6600H

Core Ultra 5 225U
Core Ultra 5 225U
The Core Ultra 5 225U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 6600H
Ryzen 5 6600H
The Ryzen 5 6600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,578 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 5 6600H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225U versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600H — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 6600H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225U scores 18,434 against the Ryzen 5 6600H's 18,578 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 6600H. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+7% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-17% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-U (2025) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 18,434 | 18,578 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,374 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,846 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 6600H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core Ultra 5 225U) / not specified (Ryzen 5 6600H). The Core Ultra 5 225U includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)), while the Ryzen 5 6600H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225U rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












