
Ryzen 7 5800
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,735 vs 26,054).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.7 vs 86.8 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.8 vs 73.7 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 7 5800
2020Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.8 vs 73.7 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,735 vs 26,054).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.7 vs 86.8 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 better than Ryzen 7 5800?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 401 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 643 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 536 FPS | 511 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 556 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800 and Ryzen 7 PRO 5845


Ryzen 7 5800
Ryzen 7 5800
The Ryzen 7 5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,735 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5800 and Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). Both are built on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture using a 7 nm, 12 nm process. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800 scores 25,735 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 26,054 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,735 | 26,054+1% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5845). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800 targets OEM Gaming.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | OEM Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 debuted at $300. On MSRP ($349 vs $300), the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is $49 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800 delivers 73.7 pts/$ vs 86.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 the 16.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $300-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.7 | 86.8+18% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












