
Ryzen 7 5800
Popular choices:

Xeon E7-8880 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,735 vs 25,966).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8880 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Xeon E7-8880 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E7-8880 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5800
2020Xeon E7-8880 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,735 vs 25,966).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8880 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Xeon E7-8880 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800 better than Xeon E7-8880 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 401 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 631 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 597 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 531 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 271 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 643 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 632 FPS |
| ultra | 536 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 556 FPS | 634 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 397 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800 and Xeon E7-8880 v2


Ryzen 7 5800
Ryzen 7 5800
The Ryzen 7 5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,735 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E7-8880 v2
Xeon E7-8880 v2
The Xeon E7-8880 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 25,966 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-8880 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-8880 v2 has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E7-8880 v2 — a 39% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800 is built on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800 scores 25,735 against the Xeon E7-8880 v2's 25,966 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E7-8880 v2. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8880 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 15 / 30+88% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+48% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+36% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 37.5 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 25,735 | 25,966 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8880 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800) / not specified (Xeon E7-8880 v2). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800 targets OEM Gaming.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | OEM Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












