
Ryzen 7 5800
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2265
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $690 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,039 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 198.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.7 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,039 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2265 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2265, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon W-2265
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,700 vs 25,735).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.7 vs 73.7 PassMark/$ ($1,039 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5800
2020Xeon W-2265
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $690 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,039 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 198.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.7 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,039 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2265 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2265, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,700 vs 25,735).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.7 vs 73.7 PassMark/$ ($1,039 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800 better than Xeon W-2265?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 459 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 401 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 198 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 642 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 642 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 389 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 643 FPS | 642 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 536 FPS | 642 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 556 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800 and Xeon W-2265


Ryzen 7 5800
Ryzen 7 5800
The Ryzen 7 5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,735 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-2265
Xeon W-2265
The Xeon W-2265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,700 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2265 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-2265 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2265 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2265 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800 is built on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800 scores 25,735 against the Xeon W-2265's 25,700 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800 vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2265.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+66% | 19.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 25,735 | 25,700 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2265 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800) / not specified (Xeon W-2265). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800 targets OEM Gaming.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | OEM Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2265 debuted at $1039. On MSRP ($349 vs $1039), the Ryzen 7 5800 is $690 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800 delivers 73.7 pts/$ vs 24.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2265 — making the Ryzen 7 5800 the 99.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-66% | $1039 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.7+198% | 24.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












