
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2697 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 145W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,870 vs 20,990).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $220 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2697 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2697 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌314.3% higher power demand at 145W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
2024Xeon E5-2697 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 145W, a 110W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,870 vs 20,990).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $220 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2697 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌314.3% higher power demand at 145W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2697 v4 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 522 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 522 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 522 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 522 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 374 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE and Xeon E5-2697 v4


Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,870 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2697 v4
Xeon E5-2697 v4
The Xeon E5-2697 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 20,990 points. Launch price was $2,702.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v4 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 20,870 against the Xeon E5-2697 v4's 20,990 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2697 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2697 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 18 / 36+125% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+28% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+39% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 45 MB+181% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4.5 MB+800% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 20,870 | 20,990 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












