
Core Ultra 5 225U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 35W, a 21W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,409 vs 18,434).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 35W vs 14W.
Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 35W, a 21W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,409 vs 18,434).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 35W vs 14W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225U better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 173 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 329 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE

Core Ultra 5 225U
Core Ultra 5 225U
The Core Ultra 5 225U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,409 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225U versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE — a 11% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225U scores 18,434 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE's 18,409 — a 0.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225U. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225U vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | — | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-U (2025) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 18,434 | 18,409 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,374 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,846 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core Ultra 5 225U) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE). The Core Ultra 5 225U includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225U rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












